atomic bombs are not biological weapons, but things like napalm (that was used by the US during the Vietnam war) is; the idea is that you spread poison around, and not allow anything to grow. On the other hand, an atomic bomb just releases large quantities of energy
atomic bombs (or better, nuclear bombs) are not biological weapons. Biological weapons are those which kill using chemistry or biology rather than pure explosive power. So things like poisons, viruses, toxic gas, and the like. These this are particularly nasty and are banned for use in warfare by the United Nations.
Atomic bombs are not biological weapons, biological weapons are ones that use living organisims like bacteria and fungi, or viruses to attatck other people. We can definitely make these kinds of weapons, and they can do a lot of damage.
Governments do make biological weapons but they are tricky. There are dozens of films about what might happen in a bio weapon got out of control and they try very hard to not make that a reality. Personally I’d prefer people to spend their time on diplomacy and the persual or peace.
There are rules in war, those relating to the use of biological and chemical weapons are defined by the Geneva protocol (or also “The Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare”).
Comments
hepworthandsimmons commented on :
why banned there is no rules in war ?
Sam commented on :
There are rules in war, those relating to the use of biological and chemical weapons are defined by the Geneva protocol (or also “The Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare”).
hepworthandsimmons commented on :
ok you win